women

To consider men and women equal, Western discourse gives women a masculine identity

They wanted to give women a masculine identity. That is to say, they were trying to make women do jobs which are more compatible with the physical and mental characteristics of men. They consider it as a source of honor, and they would like to describe it as an advantage and a source of honor for women. It is the right outlook to know women - the way they are, as true women and true females - by taking their gender into consideration and we should see what values can help a female individual or the female community achieve growth and transcendence.

Islam has educated great female scholars. Today in our society, you can see a great number of women specialists, scientists, doctors, researchers and artists; among them there are great thought leaders. The same is true in the political arena, in the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. In all sections of the country, women are actively involved. This is not the matter in the difference between the Islamic and western ideology and thinking. The difference is in something else.

 

November 13, 1991

 

The western discourse on the issue of women has different dimensions, but it has two distinct dimensions. One is that it wants to give women a masculine identity. That is to say, it wants to make women behave like men. This is an important dimension of this discourse. Another is that it wants to make women prepare the ground for men to indulge in pleasure, whether the pleasure of watching women or other kinds of pleasure which are beyond this. This is another dimension of the western discourse in regards to women. The issue of feminism and other such things - which have become popular in the world today - are, in fact, the products of western discourse. These are the consequences of western discourse.

They wanted to give women a masculine identity. That is to say, they were trying to make women do jobs which are more compatible with the physical and mental characteristics of men. They consider it as a source of honor, and they would like to describe it as an advantage and a source of honor for women. We have adopted a passive outlook in the face of this. We have been deceived, and we have unwillingly and unknowingly accepted this. As you see, today we are proud of having such and such a number of women in certain executive positions. What I am saying should not be misunderstood. I do not have any problems with the idea of giving women executive positions. That is to say, I do not forbid women from doing this, and I do not deny this right. I do not think it is wrong. Our minister of health and vice presidents were female, and women have positions in different sectors. In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with this. What is wrong is to be proud of this, to boast about this in the world and say, "See, we have such and such a number of women in executive positions." This is the same as being deceived and passive. This is not a source of honor.

Take the case of a lady who has certain qualifications, who has developed her capabilities and who is suitable for a specific position. She can be allowed to hold this position because it is not illegal, but if we are proud of having such and such a number of female officials in charge of executive affairs, this is wrong. If we feel proud of having a large number of intellectual and educated women, this is good and it is okay. If we say that we have a large number of women who are active in cultural and political areas, this is alright too. If we say that we have a large number of mujahid women in different areas, who are ready to be martyred, this is good. If we say that we have a large number of women who are active in political and revolutionary arenas and who write and deliver speeches, this is good.

Being proud of these things is good, but being proud of having such and such a number of female ministers, MPs, deputies, and managers in financial organizations, is wrong. This means adopting a passive outlook in the face of the enemies. Are we supposed to entrust women with masculine occupations? No, the position, identity, and characteristics of women are very noble and respectable. This identity is, in certain ways, superior to men's identity. If we adopt a comprehensive outlook, we see that men and women have no differences. Certain privileges have been granted to women and certain other privileges have been granted to men, and this is based on their natural characteristics which Allah the Exalted has bestowed on them. Allah the Exalted has given each gender certain characteristics. Each gender benefits from certain outstanding qualities. Therefore, they have no differences in terms of human qualities. They have no differences in terms of the privileges which Allah the Exalted has bestowed on humanity such as human rights, social rights, spiritual values, and spiritual perfection. That is to say, a man can become Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s.) and a woman can become Fatima Zahra (s.a.). A man can become Jesus (a.s.) and a woman can become Mary (s.a.). They are not different from each other. 

Therefore, it is the right outlook to know women - the way they are, as true women and true females - by taking their gender into consideration and we should see what values can help a female individual or the female community achieve growth and transcendence. This outlook is the right outlook. We should not have adopted a passive outlook in the face of western outlook but, unfortunately, we did.

May 11, 2013

Tags

  • Iranian women
  • Women
  • Women in Islam

Comment